{"id":1648,"date":"2008-12-08T00:15:12","date_gmt":"2008-12-08T07:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sackrider.org\/?p=1648"},"modified":"2025-06-15T06:07:28","modified_gmt":"2025-06-15T06:07:28","slug":"movie-review-transporter-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/movie-review-transporter-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Movie Review: Transporter 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wow&#8230; Ok, if you saw <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0293662\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Transporter<\/a> and loved it, then you most likely went to see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0388482\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Transporter 2<\/a>&#8230; and hated it.\u00c2\u00a0 Well&#8230; Hates a strong word &#8211; its really only the one scene that make everyone cringe when they think of the sequel.\u00c2\u00a0 The scene where the movie <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jump_the_shark\" target=\"_blank\">jumps the shark<\/a> &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0005458\/\" target=\"_blank\">Jason Stamos<\/a>, in an attempt to remove a bomb from his car, flips the car upside down and in mid-air scrapes the bomb off the bottom of the car by passing under a crane hook, saving the car and himself by mere seconds.\u00c2\u00a0 Most of the audience was thinking, why not just get out and take it off or run over a speed bump really fast, or anything other than the impossible mess I just saw.<\/p>\n<p>Dismissing the why, just accomplishing this feat is impossible.\u00c2\u00a0 I call these moments &#8216;leaps of logic&#8217;.\u00c2\u00a0 Scenes that defy the rules of physics; my wife rolls her eyes when a moment like that ruins a movie for me since the movie itself is often a ridiculous plot in outerspace or involving monsters or supernatural creatures of some sort, however physics are physics.\u00c2\u00a0 For instance, traveling faster than the speed of light isn&#8217;t (or at least typically isn&#8217;t) regarded as possible, however most space-based TV shows and movies involve faster than light travel.\u00c2\u00a0 This isn&#8217;t a leap of logic because the shows give my brain something to dismiss it &#8211; subspace time travel&#8230; OK I&#8217;m losing you, I know.\u00c2\u00a0 Back to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt1129442\/\" target=\"_blank\">Transporter 3<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>If you saw both the original and the sequel, AND are interested in seeing the third movie, then I put you in one of two camps &#8211; you either simply were not bothered by the crane-bomb scene in the second movie or you hope the producers listened to the critics and ensure that nothing so ridicules makes it into the third movie.\u00c2\u00a0 I was in the latter group, the producers made this movie for the first group.<\/p>\n<p>If the crane-bomb scene didn&#8217;t bother you than 20 or 30 such scenes won&#8217;t either, right?\u00c2\u00a0 Like say putting a man through a concrete block wall with a single punch and having him get up un-scathed would be fine (don&#8217;t cite super-hero comic movies, they give my brain an excuse &#8211; they are super-human and can take the abuse).\u00c2\u00a0 How about floating a car from the bottom of a lake using nothing but a couple of duffle bags and the air from the cars tires?\u00c2\u00a0 Think that&#8217;s tuff &#8211; try doing that while the car is sinking and using the air from the tires to breath while creating the duffle bag balloons.<\/p>\n<p>Ok &#8211; lets move past the leaps of logic that bother me, others don&#8217;t mind as much as I do&#8230; the plot, acting, and action should be enough to redeem that anyway, right?\u00c2\u00a0 Well&#8230; The plot was weak &#8211; it felt a lot like they made this movie so that the series would be a trilogy, not because there was any compelling story to tell &#8211; and they threw in the currently popular Hollywood lick the bark mindset, because why not, right.\u00c2\u00a0 The acting &#8211; its an action flick, the acting is irrelevant.\u00c2\u00a0 It wasn&#8217;t so bad as to get in the way, but it wasn&#8217;t so good that you are sucked into caring about the characters &#8211; which is right on the mark for an action movie.\u00c2\u00a0 The action?<\/p>\n<p>Well, the fight scenes were good, but the car scenes were too few to be a transporter movie.\u00c2\u00a0 Most of the hand to hand combat scenes were obviously coryographed &#8211; I mean like bad-guy-swings-putting-his-arm-in-position-to-be-grabbed-and-holds-extended-position-for-1.2-seconds-while-good-guy-wraps-said-arm-up-with-shirt kinda obvious.\u00c2\u00a0 Still, the fight scenes were the highlight of the film.<\/p>\n<p>To top it off, continuity issues abound.\u00c2\u00a0 I don&#8217;t\u00c2\u00a0 mean like in one scene the pen is in his pocket but in the next its missing kind of stuff&#8230; more like &#8220;weren&#8217;t the airbags deployed in that last since, when did he get the dash fixed and the airbags put back&#8221;, or &#8220;didn&#8217;t he just bust out both windows, he must of had those replaced during the subsecond switch between camera 1 and camera 2&#8221; kind of stuff.<\/p>\n<p>If you think Jason Stamos is the best action star ever then you might consider renting this using your <a href=\"http:\/\/www.netflix.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Netflix<\/a> account since it doesn&#8217;t cost you thing more than you are already paying.\u00c2\u00a0 Otherwise&#8230; don&#8217;t bother.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wow&#8230; Ok, if you saw The Transporter and loved it, then you most likely went to see The Transporter 2&#8230; and hated it.\u00c2\u00a0 Well&#8230; Hates a strong word &#8211; its really only the one scene that make everyone cringe when they think of the sequel.\u00c2\u00a0 The scene where the movie jumps the shark &#8211; Jason [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1648"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1650,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1648\/revisions\/1650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sackrider.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}